VACCINE TRUTH UK - Graphene in Covid vaccines

One of the most controversial topics raised by the Covid vaccine dissidents is accusations that the jabs contain graphene oxide, a toxic material that, in nano-amounts, can produce a wide variety of symptoms and damage to the human body, including symptoms identical to those described for severe Covid-19 infection.

February 12, 2022 Owl Graphene,

Let’s look at the sequence of events for this topic, and then examine the research into graphene’s toxic effects.

June 24th, 2021 Scientists from La Quinta Columna in Spain analysed vials of Covid-19 vaccines and published photographs of the contents they found. The left-hand photo showed the vaccine sample, and on the right-hand side was a photo of graphene nanoparticles, oriiginally published in the scientific literature. They appeared identical.

June 26th, 2021

Based on graphene’s known toxicity symptoms, La Quinta Columna announced: “COVID-19 is caused by graphene oxide introduced by several ways into the body”. They cited face masks, test swabs and vaccines.

June 27th, 2021 Argentine geneticist Dr. Luis Marcelo Martinez said: “Spike protein is nothing more than graphene inside your body and ‘spiking’ you. The graphene generates systemic inflammation with cytokine storm, thrombi and lung involvement. What’s all that? Well, that is the picture … called COVID.”

July 3rd, 2021 Dr Ricardo Delgado, speaking on a Spanish talk show: “[In the vaccines we found] a small trace of RNA that does not correspond to, let’s say, the main component. 98% to 99% of the vial is precisely graphene oxide, that is, the main component of the vaccine is graphene oxide. So this is what is worrying, because we suspect that AstraZeneca probably had a higher dose than those that have been administered lately and that is why it generated more thrombi initially.”

July 6th, 2021 La Quinta Columna announced that they had found graphene oxide in Astra Zeneca vaccine vials.

July 22nd, 2021 Spectroscopy analysis reveals 99.5% graphene oxide in Moderna vaccination vial.

July 24th, 2022 Investigators reveal that a patent (KR20210028062A) for physiological saline used in many vaccines, already contains graphene oxide, and has existed since 2012. This opens the door to the possibility that we’re not only talking about anti-COVID vaccines containing graphene, but probably also vaccines for flu, tetanus, diphtheria, meningitis, etc. About a million people died after the 2019 flu vaccination campaign. It was a very virulent flu, they said.

August 11th 2021 Reuters stated: “Pfizer and Moderna told Reuters … that graphene oxide is not among their vaccines’ ingredients.”

September 20th, 2021 Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen Press Conference, Part 2, Undeclared substances in covid vaccines. Participants: Prof. Dr. Arne Burckhardt, Prof. Dr. Walter Lang, Dr. Maria Hubmer-Mogg, Dr. Uta Langer, Dr. med. Axel Bolland, Dr. Michael Dykta, Attorney Viviane Fischer, Attorney Holger Fischer, Attorney Elmar Becker. The group shows microscopic photos and videos of contaminants in various different covid vaccines including some that look like microchips, some that contain chromium, nickel, or iron, some that look like fibres, and some that make cracked patterns with many tiny dots when dry. It is not known what any of these particles are or why they are in the vaccines. The group emphasized that any food or drug that showed this kind of contamination and were not listed as ingredients would be immediately pulled off the market.

November 7th, 2021 Dr Pablo Campra summarises his work so far

November 28th, 2021 Europe’s leading carbon expert, Dr Andreas Noack, reports finding graphene hydroxide (=reduced graphene oxide or rGO) in Covid vaccines. He describes them as nanoscale razor blades which cut up the blood vessels little by little. Dr Noack passed away shortly after making this finding. He was a noted expert in this field.

December 16th, 2021 Graphene found in AstraZeneca, Sinovac, and Pfizer vials distributed in Chile.

December 17th, 2021

Vaccine vial analysis carried out in Chilean independent lab. Graphene found in AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sinovac vials. Investigator was not told the vials were vaccines. Ricardo Delgado: “The purpose is to introduce nanotechnology that self-assembles by external electromagnetic field mechanisms. With certain frequencies that form more complex nanostructures. Once the graphene sheets that you’re looking at are exfoliated, the so-called graphene quantum dots, the GQDs, are generated. And as a consequence of the graphene quantum dots, more complex structures such as nano-routers and nano-antennas, for example, are created. This is the reason why most inoculated people are emitting a MAC address, which is registered in Bluetooth wireless technology.”

January 6th, 2022 Drs Sevillano and Delgado say that the presence of graphene explains what’s happening to soccer players and other athletes. Graphene is a superconductor. It’s going to have affinity in areas where there’s greater electrical conductivity, so once inside the body, graphene goes to the heart, because that’s where the highest electrical activity is found. Once graphene is on the heart wall, it is inert as long as it’s not excited from the outside. But if an excitatory signal comes from outside, that signal makes graphene absorb energy. The absorbed energy is sent to the wall of the myocyte. This makes the myocyte depolarize. Calcium and potassium channels, among others, are opened, disrupting everything that regulates the membrane potential difference. This is electrophysiology.

January 16th, 2022 Argentina’s National Administration of Drugs, Foods and Medical Devices (ANMAT) admits that vaccines contain graphene. In a legal case involving a post-vaccine death, they were forced by the prosecutor Carlos Insaurralde to admit the inadmissible. ANMAT ended up admitting that the vaccine they are injecting in the entire population contains graphene.

February 5th, 2022 Graphene found in UK Covid vaccine samples, independent lab analysis

Many investigators are becoming concerned that the Covid-19 virus has never been isolated

July 18th, 2021 Geneticist Dr. Luis Marcelo Martínez explains why there’s no concrete evidence of isolation, purification, and characterization of SARS-CoV-2. He says: “The only thing they’ve done is to sequence genetic information coming from multiple origins – a culture soup. I invite anyone, anywhere, to show me a purified virus and animal tests with that virus. The Covid-19 virus is fake. The variants are nonsense because all the clinical pictures are the same. It’s the same flu, same pneumonia. They have been drawing variants using computer programs. It’s that easy.”

July 30th, 2021 Dr. Martín Monteverde, spokesman for a group of health professionals in Argentina, reports a confirmation from the Minister of Health that no COVID-19 virus has been isolated in Argentina. “The United States CDC replied that they have not isolated the virus either. Nor have the Chinese. And, so far, no country in the world says they have isolated the virus. The whole pandemic is based on the PCR test. The mainstream media are using the test to tell us that there are dead and infected people and that there is another wave and another variant.” The Argentine Health Minister was also asked if the test is actually finding the virus when you are told that you tested positive. The minister answered “No. The PCR finds a little piece of the virus – approximately 37 base pairs of DNA or RNA.” The supposed genome of the virus has 37,000 pairs. How can they tell you that you got a positive result when they have only found 37 pairs?

If we look at the symptoms of graphene poisoning, they are identical to those of “severe Covid-19 infection”

Rhazouani A, Gamrani H, El Achaby M, et al. Synthesis and Toxicity of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles: A Literature Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:5518999. Published 2021 Jun 10. doi:10.1155/2021/5518999

Studies have shown that administration of graphene oxide (GO) into the trachea of mice caused fibrosis to develop in lung tissue after 21 days. In cells, GO increased the rate of mitochondrial respiration and the generation of reactive oxygen species, activating inflammatory and apoptotic pathways. In addition to respiratory exposures, GO, after entering the body by intravenous injection, could also be retained in the lung and induce the formation of granulomas and pulmonary edema. Also, inhaled GO can destroy the ultrastructure and biophysical properties of pulmonary surfactant film, which is the host’s first line of defense.

GO-based nanomaterials have been used as topical antimicrobial media in the form of bandages, ointments, or cotton fabric. Thus, dermal exposure is an important route of exposure that deserves attention.

Regarding the placental barrier, one study suggested that the placenta does not provide a barrier against the transfer of nanoparticles to the fetus.

Studies on the blood-brain barrier have found that reduced graphene oxide is capable, over time, of inserting itself into the interendothelial cleft and decreasing the paracellular seal of the barrier.

After intraperitoneal injection, GO polyethylene glycol (GO-PEG) functionalized derivatives are mainly retained in the reticuloendothelial system, including the liver and spleen. However, these GO-PEG derivatives do not show any tissue absorption by oral administration.

GO excretion varies in different organs. In the lungs, GO is challenging to eliminate, causing inflammation, cell infiltration, granuloma formation, and pulmonary edema. In the liver, GO nanoparticles can be eliminated through the hepatobiliary pathway by following the duodenum’s bile duct. Moreover, GO-PEG’s functional derivatives accumulated primarily in the liver and the spleen can be eliminated gradually, probably via the kidneys and fecal excretion.

Intravenous administration of GO caused massive pulmonary thromboembolism in mice. The prothrombotic character of GO was found to be dependent on the distribution of the surface charge. Direct administration of GO into the lungs of mice resulted in severe and chronic lung damage. These GO nanosheets disrupted the alveolar-capillary barrier, allowing inflammatory cells to infiltrate the lungs and stimulate the release of proinflammatory cytokines.

Animal studies found that GO was not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. A low dose of GO can however attach to the gastrointestinal surface and cause damage by its abundant sharp edges. The study of the toxicity of GO in male rats by the oral route showed hepatotoxic effects and induction of oxidative stress. There was an increase in liver enzyme activity and morphological alteration of the liver tissue.

Amrollahi et al. evaluated the toxicity of GO in Wistar rats. The results of their study showed that GO has a toxic effect on nerve tissue. Microscopic sections when analysed revealed that the cerebral and cerebellar cortex’s specific neuronal cells showed degeneration and necrosis. Bleeding in brain tissue was observed in animals with GO intoxication, as well as a significant change in locomotor behavior markers, such as speed, acceleration, and stopping time.

Studies have also shown that GO is capable of inducing genotoxicity. Liu and colleagues found that GO induced mutagenesis at the molecular level.

Studies have shown that the interaction between GO and cell membranes is one of the main causes of GO cytotoxicity. The interaction of the GO with the lipid membrane is the mechanism for the destructive extraction of membrane lipids. Once GO penetrates the cell, it can destroy high amounts of lipid membrane phospholipids and induce cell membrane degradation.

The generation of ROS and oxidative stress in cells treated with GO leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, inflammatory reactions, apoptosis, and necrosis.

Sanchez VC, Jachak A, Hurt RH, Kane AB. Biological interactions of graphene-family nanomaterials: an interdisciplinary review. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012;25(1):15-34. doi:10.1021/tx200339h

There are four distinct entry routes for nanomaterials into the human body: inhalation, ingestion, dermal penetration, and injection or implantation for biomedical applications.

The alveolar region (the main oxygen absorption tissue) of the lung does not have a protective mucus layer due to its gas exchange function. Graphenes deposited in the alveolar region may be engulfed by alveolar macrophages and cleared very slowly over months or years. The biopersistence of graphenes may impair this clearance mechanism and potentially cause scarring or fibrosis of the alveolar region.

Nano GO is able to insert itself into DNA, as reported by Ren et al. who provide evidence that nano GO intercalates between base pairs in dsDNA, in a manner similar to planar aromatics that are known DNA intercalants.

Graphene oxide is attractive in DNA or RNA delivery and sensing, especially when used in the form of “nanosheets”. The studies mentioned functionalize the nano-GO with PEG, which is claimed to be necessary to achieve adequate stable dispersions in biological media.

The researchers conclude that this finding may lead to concern about the potential toxicity of small-dimension GO in the human body, but may also open up applications for new chemotherapeutic agents in the common class that work through DNA intercalation.

3 views0 comments