** UPDATED ** Reiner Fuellmich giving evidence to the Grand Jury in The Hague - Day1

Updated: Feb 9


The transcription of Reiner Fuellmich's testimony below has been fully updated to include the names of the expert witnesses that will be called - starting on 12th February




Click to watch, or copy link to your browser,

https://givefastlink.com/wp-content/plugins/aio-video-downloader/download.php?source=youtube&media=Mg==

or watch it on YouTub (if you must) using the (watch on youtube) link below

Reiner Fuellmich’s Grand Jury, Day 1 – Opening Statements [VIDEO]

February 6, 2022 TLB Staff COMMENTARY, GOVERNMENT, HEALTH, Tyranny, WORLD 4

GrandJuryDay1-min.jpg.webp


ER Editor: The video of the opening statements of Day 1 lasts around 1 hour, 35 minutes. Below we’re providing some detailed notes on what is said and by whom, which does not substitute for listening to the whole thing. At the 10 minute mark, Viviane Fischer introduces the proceedings – this is where the video begins.

All participants make their case to us watching, we the jury. They explain the basis for their arguments; Reiner Fuellmich describes the steps of his case and which witnesses will be called (it is an impressive list of diverse experts) to testify at each step.

GrandJuryday1insert.jpg.webp


****

ANA GARNER, USA


This enactment of a Grand Jury investigation, common in the US, is a model legal proceeding to the citizens of the world against leaders, instigators and accomplices in the formulation and execution of a plan to create a pandemic. It is a people’s investigation, called – ‘the people’s court of public opinion’.


It is based on Natural Law, which in turn is founded on the notion that everybody is capable of distinguishing between good and evil, right and wrong. Humanity is at a critical stage which depends on the awakening of all people; the trajectory we are on must be reversed, and this grand jury enactment will contribute to that in rapid fashion.


A grand jury hears evidence and then determines if a criminal indictment can be returned against the accused. It is usually conducted behind closed doors without the accused being present; this grand jury will be done, however, before the public using a real judge, lawyers and witnesses. It originates within a constitutional model of government that respects people’s natural rights and freedoms. We ask you, the public, to review the evidence presented to recapture our freedoms.


JUDGE RUI FONSECA E CASTRO, PORTUGAL


During the last 2 years we’ve witnessed the collapse of the democratic Rule of Law. Our most fundamental rights and freedoms have been taken from us in the name of a ‘common good’ that has never been endorsed.


I We expect a gigantic wave of victims to follow. Justice systems are no longer fulfilling their duties, i.e. there are no longer judges in Berlin. We cannot wait; we must assume our responsibilities to prevent tyranny. Natural Law gives us our sacred rights to oppose tyranny; it gives people legitimacy to do so. National and international justice systems have clearly failed to protect us from the tyranny we are witnessing. So it is within unwritten natural law that this court finds its legitimacy to initiate legal proceedings.


DEANA POLLARD SACKS, USA


The US Declaration of Independence: we hold these truths to be self-evident … In 1891, the US Supreme Court explained that medical liberty is inalienable. Every individual has the control and possession of his/her own person. It is a right of complete immunity.

In 1914, Judge Cardoso reaffirmed the same principle.

In 1990, the US Supreme Court affirmed the right of a person to reject medical treatment.


These rights come out of English Common Law. Anglo-American law begins with assumption that a person has full self-determination, is a master of his/her own body and may reject medical treatment.

So how can our govts push an untested medical treatment on us without our consent, putting our livelihoods at risk? Jacobsen vs. Massachussetts is the case the US government is relying on. This case actually does not support vaccine mandates.

In 1902 hundreds of millions were killed in a smallpox pandemic, with a 30% death rate. Massachusetts passed a law that said you had an option to get vaccinated or pay a $5 fine. Jacobsen contested both these options: he paid his fine and demanded his money back.

The smallpox vaccine had been used for 100 years and had been used extensively. After researching its efficacy and utility, the court determined that Jacobsen should NOT get a refund. The ruling in this case was based on Jacobsen’s right to have, and an acknowledgement of, totally free mobility in his non-vaccinated state.

This ruling does not support today’s vaccine mandates.


Covid, unlike smallpox in 1902, has killed a fraction of 1%, so the public risk element is not there. Further, the Covid vaccines are not actually vaccines.

The smallpox vaccines did prevent transmission; today’s experimental treatments don’t, and we don’t know the long-term effects.

Finally, Jacobsen’s punishment was a $150 equivalent sum in today’s terms. Today, people are losing their homes, livelihoods and college education. There is simply no comparison.

So why haven’t the Covid vaccine mandates been declared unconstitutional? (She goes onto explain the importance of the Liberty Clause which grants the public their medical freedoms, and it is under this clause that the vaccines can be declared unconstitutional.) The nature of today’s Covid vaccines vs. vaccines of the past is a critical point.

ReinerVivianeDay1.jpg.webp



REINER FUELLMICH


Good afternoon.

My name is Reiner Fuellmich and it is my pleasure to serve as one member of a group of distinguished international attorneys and lawyers who have been collaborating on this very important case for many months now.


This case involving the most heinous crimes against humanity committed under the guise of a “corona pandemic” on a global scale looks complicated only at first glance. But when you put together all those pieces – all those little pieces of the puzzle, as we will do this for you with the help of many renowned experts and other witnesses during this proceeding – you will see four sets of facts.


Despite the seeming complexity of the evidence, there are just 4 sets of relevant facts:


1. There is no corona pandemic but only a PCR test plandemic fuelled by an elaborate psychological operation designed to create a constant state of panic among the world’s population. This agenda has been long planned – its ultimately unsuccessful precursor was the swine flu some 12 years ago – and it was cooked up by a group of super rich psychopathic and sociopathic people who hate and fear people at the same time, have no empathy, and are driven by the desire to gain full control over all of us, the people of the world. They are using our governments and the mainstream media, both of which they literally own, to convey their panic propaganda 24/7.


2. The virus itself can be treated safely and effectively with vitamin C, D, zinc etc and also with off-label use of ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine etc. But all these, not alternative methods of treatment but, real methods of treatment were banned by those who are using the guise of this plandemic to push their ultimate goal which is to get everyone to receive the, as we will show in this proceeding, not only ineffective but highly dangerous – yes lethal – experimental injections.


3. the same people who made the swine flu, which ultimately turned out to be a mild flu, into a pandemic 12 years ago – by first changing the definition of what a pandemic is and then, creating panic – created this corona pandemic.

The swine flu was their first real attempt at creating a pandemic. And just as one of its purposes then was to divert our attention from the blatantly fraudulent activities of their financial industry – more aptly to be called a financial mafia which had become visible through the Lehman crisis – this is also one of their major purposes of this corona pandemic now.


Had we taken a closer look then, during the Lehman crisis, instead of blindly believing our government’s promises that the perpetrators of those financial crimes will be held liable, we would have seen then that they had been looting and plundering our public coffers for decades. And we would have seen that our governments are not our governments anymore, rather, they have been taken over by the other side through their main platform the World Economic Forum which had started to create their own global leaders through their Young Global Leaders program as early as 1992. Two of the first graduates being Angela Merkel and Bill Gates. And we would have understood, already then, what we will show you now through this proceeding – these financial crimes went unchallenged by our politicians because they are aiding and abetting those who commit them and profiting from these crimes.


4. Ultimately however, we will show to you – the jury – that the other side’s main purpose is to gain full and complete control over all of us. This involves the finalisation of their looting and plundering by deliberately destroying our small and medium-sized businesses, retail businesses, hotel and restaurants so that platforms such as Amazon can take over.


And this involves population control which, in their view, requires both a massive reduction of the population and manipulating the DNA of the remaining population with the help, for example, of mRNA experimental injections.

But it also requires, in their view, the deliberate destruction of democracy, of the rule of law and of our constitutions through chaos so that ultimately we will agree to losing our national and cultural identities and instead will accept: a one world government – under the UN [United Nations] which is now under the full control of them and their World Economic Forum – a digital passport through which each and every move is monitored and controlled and one digital currency which we will only be able to receive from one world bank, theirs of course.


At the conclusion of the case and after you have heard all the evidence, we are confident that you will recommend indictments against all six putative figurehead defendants: Christian Drosten of Germany; Anthony Fauci of the United States; Tedros of the World Health Organisation; Bill Gates; BlackRock and Pfizer.


There are numerous platforms on which this group has been meeting and discussing this agenda. But the most important one is that of the World Economic Forum which was invented in 1971 by, a then 33-year-old, Klaus Schwab. Its members are: a thousand global corporations with at least 5 billion US dollars in annual sales; politicians; media representatives; scientists; and, other so-called high-profile personalities. They meet once a year in Davos but there are other such meetings for example, in China.


And since 1992 they have created and presented to us their own group of political leaders for the world. Among the first graduates, as I mentioned before, are Angela Merkel and Bill Gates in 1992. Others are: Sebastian Kurz, up until recently chancellor of Austria; Justin Trudeau, prime minister of Canada; Jacinda Ardern, prime minister of New Zealand; Emmanuel Macron, president of France; and, many, many more..


This group, which is now called the “Davos Clique,” is openly – the publication ‘The Great Reset’ by Klaus schwab is one of the most important sources for this information – promoting the shifting of the world’s assets to this group of super-rich people so that in 2030 ordinary people “will own nothing and be happy” as it explicitly states there, under their one world government with a digital currency given to us by their one world bank and they’re also openly promoting – in close cooperation with people like the putative defendant Bill Gates, the Rockefellers and others – the drastic reduction of the world’s population and the manipulation of the remaining population’s DNA all the way into transhumanism.


The pandemic was the way into this scenario, which had been planned going back to 2001, called Operation Dark Winter. Then the Rockefeller Foundation did another rehearsal in 2010 called Operation Lockstep. Finally, there was Event 201 in 2019, sponsored by Johns Hopkins, the Gates Foundation, the WEF and the Rockefeller Foundation.


Their most important goal is, however, the controlled, by them of course, implosion of the completely looted financial system and simultaneous introduction of a digital currency issued by one world bank, controlled by them, and, just as important, the introduction of a world government under the UN, which has come under their full control in 2019. For this purpose, they have made concrete plans for this corona plandemic since at least the spring of 2001, operation “Dark Winter,” followed by:

  • Another such rehearsal the “Lockstep” exercise by the Rockefeller foundation in 2010; and finally,

  • Event 201” in October of 2019 in New York sponsored by the Johns Hopkins Centre for Health Security, the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Members of the jury, we will call a number of different highly renowned expert witnesses from all walks of science, but also witnesses who will testify to the damage that they suffered as a result of getting the experimental injections, in this trial.

After our opening statements we will start off, in a week from now, by calling:

  • a former member of the US military, James Bush, who participated in operation Dark Winter in 2001;

  • former members of the British intelligence services Brian Gerrish and Alex Thomson; and

  • investigative journalists Whitney web and Matthew Ehret;

  • former World Health Organisation employees and advisors Dr. Sylvia Behrend and Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger.

They will explain to us the historical and geopolitical background of what we are confronted with. And they will show to us how this agenda has been planned for at least 20 years start starting with operation Dark Winter in 2001 and, some 10 years later, the Lockstep Scenario by the Rockefeller Foundation, ending with the dress rehearsal Event 201 in October of 2019. In the end they will explain how, when there were no cases which they needed to declare a public health emergency of international concern, they created them by having defendant Drosten invent the story of asymptomatic infections, which don’t exist, and how this PCR test can detect, through mass screening of perfectly healthy people, those who are infected is a lie, as we will show.

We will continue with the next group of witnesses:

  • Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, an experienced lung specialist and former member of the German Bundestag and the Council of Europe, who managed to expose the other side’s first attempt at a pandemic, the swine flu of 12 years ago, as a mild flu;

  • Professor Ulrike Kämmerer, biologist from Würzburg University;

  • Dr Mike Yeadon former Vice President of Pfizer;

  • Dr Sylvia Behrend; Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger; Professor Dolores Cahill of Dublin University; Professor Antonia Gatti from Italy; Professor Berkholtz from Germany.

These experts will explain to us what is behind the legend of the Wuhan wet market outbreak. They will show that: the virus is no more dangerous than the common flu; the PCR test cannot tell us anything about infections but is the only basis for all anti-corona measures including the ultimate measure the so-called “vaccines”; and, the so-called “vaccines” are not only ineffective but extremely dangerous.


Regardless of the natural or man-made origin of the virus, our immune system is perfectly well capable of dealing with the virus as evidenced by an infection fatality rate of between 0.14 and 0.15, or even less, percent. There was no excess mortality anywhere until the experimental injections started. There were not even any cases in early 2020, however they needed cases in order to declare a public health emergency of international concern as this was the only basis on which it would be possible, according to their own made-up rules which all governments of the member states of the world health organization had agreed to, to use untested new drugs – the experimental injections – on people.


After a first failed attempt at announcing this public health emergency of international concern because there were no cases, they tried again in late January of 2020 – after they had created cases with the help of that now infamous Drosten PCR test – and announced this public health emergency of international concern two weeks later. We will hear from these experts that these cases were almost all false positive test results, nothing else.

The next group of experts are:

  • Dr Thomas Binder from Switzerland;

  • Dr Bryan Ardis from Texas;

  • Dr. Shankara Chetty from South Africa

  • Dr Wolfgang Wodarg from Germany; and,

  • John O’Looney undertaker from England.

These experts will tell us how right from the start we were witnessing a deliberate, completely senseless banning of normal, effective and safe methods of treatment of respiratory diseases. And instead, a mandate of treatments that must now be considered serious medical malpractice – intubation, remdesivir, midazolam. John O’Looney will explain how he first, believing the other side’s allegations about a pandemic, even helped the BBC in pushing their panic propaganda until he realised how under the guise of the pandemic people were intentionally being killed.

We will then call the next group of experts including:

  • Professor Alexandra Henrion-Caude from France;

  • Dr Mike Yeadon;

  • Professor Sucharit Bhakdi from Germany;

  • Professor Luc Montagnier from France;

  • Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Kruger from Germany;

  • Dr Robert Malone inventor of the mRNA vaccine technique from the US; and,

  • Professor Arne Burkhardt pathologist from Germany.

They will show us that: while the virus did not cause any excess mortality it has a survival rate of 99.97 percent; the shots are now killing people and have been causing excess mortality of up to 40, since September, as a result of a poisoning with the spike protein and of shutting off our immune system. Dr. Mike Yeadon will tell us how a group of scientists has even found concrete evidence that the makers of the vaccines are experimenting with lethal dosages to see how the lethal side-effects can be manipulated in such a way that the population will not immediately understand what is happening.

The next group of experts will explain to us how it could have come to this. This group includes:

  • Professor Mattias Desmet from Belgium;

  • Dr. Ariane Bilheran from France;

  • Dr Merideth Miller from the US;

  • Professor Harald Walach from Germany; and,

  • Stefan Cohen employee of the German Department of the Interior.

These experts will walk us through how the other side, after having established the public health emergency of international concern, in quick succession introduced us to the lockdown, the nonsensical and dangerous mask mandates, and the very harmful, both physically and psychologically, social distancing until they arrived at their ultimate goal – the ineffective and dangerous even lethal injections. And they will explain to us in detail how our acquiescence to all this was made possible through a gigantic psychological operation whose panic message we kept receiving through the mainstream media and our politicians’, both owned by the other side, relentless propaganda.

The next group of experts includes:

  • Leslie Manukian a former investment banker from the US;

  • Naomi Wolfe, journalist and author from the US;

  • Ernst Wolff a German economist;

  • Professor Christian Kreiss German economist;

  • Professor Holger Reichel a German economist; and,

  • Marcus Kroll a German economist.

This part of the proceeding will have these experts explain to us in great detail about the intentional destruction of our economies and how the other side is working on a controlled crash of the financial system to both: get away with the crimes that they have already committed over the past decades – looting and plundering our public coffers until there’s nothing left – and, to introduce a one world bank and digital currency plus digital passport.

The final group of experts include:

  • Matthew Ehret an investigative journalist from Canada;

  • Vera Sharav a holocaust survivor;

  • Ilana Rachel Daniel from Israel;

  • Rabbi Smith from New York;

  • Patrick Wood an expert on technocracy from the US;

  • Avital Livny from Israel.

This final part of the investigation will have these experts tell us how an important part of the other side’s agenda has to do with population control, or rather eugenics. After World War II eugenics had a bad name – Julian Huxley who founded the UNESCO set. But he and the very large group of people who supported the idea of eugenics would soon be able to continue with their efforts in this direction he openly explained. The parallels between what happened then 80 years ago and what is happening now shall not be ignored. Vera Sharav will remind us of this.


After you have heard all the evidence, we have no doubt that you will recommend indictments against all our putative defendants for crimes against humanity.

Thank you.




ANA GARNER again, on the PCR test


Basis of pandemic was a lie produced by our governments simultaneously. The Big Lie is based on the PCR test, producing a case-demic. It is a genetic manufacturing technology that looks for specific bits of genetic code, that is all. It is not a diagnostic tool for active infection. Drosten knew this, yet it’s been used to create panic and compliance.


The WHO recommended excessive cycle thresholds beyond industry standards, that produce almost 100% of false positive rates (97% in fact). So only 3% may be sick but we don’t know why because the test can’t tell us.


Inflated case and death numbers have been manufactured. From this came all the draconian, destructive anti-Covid measures. Vaccine passports are next, to lock down the planet and put people in quarantine camps.


Corruption in the system has enabled this. The end goals in Gates’ words are to vaccinate everyone on the planet with experimental gene-altering shots.


What is the definition of a case? It is usually someone who is actually sick, not simply a false-positive test result. PCR testing should only be done on sick patients along with other indicators like clinical symptoms. So we’ve been testing healthy people in large numbers.


The major health institutions have all recognized this. Drosten has shown he was aware of the test’s limitations. The test has only been good for creating worldwide panic. Death numbers due to Covid – based on a PCR test – therefore need to be reviewed.

This fear has resulted in institutionalized discrimination of people who refuse the injection. The legal evidence of intent and knowledge is in present in the related FDA materials but they’re designed to confuse the reader, even lawyers.


There is plentiful evidence of fraud and malfeasance throughout the Covid regime. The panic has been created to make the vaccine the only way out, to thus grant emergency authorization of the vaccines, which will then appear on childhood vaccine schedules. This is what is coming next.



DJIPALI OJHA, INDIA


March 2020 – we were caught unawares as a pandemic was announced. Then unheard-of measures were announced such as closing borders, social distancing, etc. Every country then went along with the same response. Media was relied upon for our information. We were told there was ‘no known cures’, yet some doctors were treating people with their own protocols of existing, re-purposed drugs and supplements.

Then the major health authorities came out against this despite the fact that lives were being saved. In India there is a rich tradition of alternative medicines, which is enshrined in a government ministry. Doctors in these traditions were treating the virus successfully. When the ‘vaccines’ were rolled out, talk about treating the virus naturally was shut down.

Doctors were ridiculed or fired. This was a red flag.

The Emergency Use Authorization is only granted when there are no other treatments available, but this was not the case. In India, certain states such as Uttar Pradesh stood out for their successful treatment using ivermectin, but this information has been suppressed by those with vaccine interests. Scientific debate has been quashed. It’s clear that the vaccine has been pushed as the only solution. In India, the vaccine manufacturers have NO immunity from damage resulting from their products. Two cases claiming significant monetary compensation have already been filed by parents who have lost their child following vaccination. (She gives case details.) Several similar cases will be filed across India in the near future. The vaccines cannot be justified as ‘vaccines’ as they do not function like them in terms of prevention and transmission. Informed consent: all legal articles of the existing bioethics convention (2005) around obtaining informed consent of people receiving the vaccines have been breached. (She reads out legal articles relating to free and informed consent and human dignity.) She also cites a Scottish case relating to medical freedom.


Further, there have been no sustained scientific debates on effective treatments, nor have their been clinical trials conducted to determine their efficacy by those who are responsible for designing and implementing public health measures. Natural immunity has simply been denied. Big Tech has contributed to this censorship. Drugs with an established safety profile are ignored while new drugs with no safety history are rolled out as safe and effective. The data surrounding drug and vaccine safety has been censored.



DEXTER REINEFELDT, SOUTH AFRICA


What is the noblest cause (he quotes Thomas Payne)? This has been exploited throughout the pandemic to advance their agenda of total control and dominance over an unsuspecting population, and how they have violated people’s constitutional rights.


They have used the slogan of ‘following the science’ in pursuing the so-called ‘common good’. We must ask: what is the true nature of the SARS CoV 2 virus? It is not a novel virus as they say; its composition is considerably like that of SARS CoV 1. Second, are there alternative treatments available to treat it? Yes, there are; these are successful. Third and finally, what is the survival rate of the Covid-19 illness? Computerized statistical models and forecasts have been used to instill fear on this topic, but in reality, the survival rate is very high indeed.

Seasonal flu has a higher mortality rate than Covid-19. So why did we pursue these anti-Covid measures? An incriminating statement Peter Daszak made to Fauci is cited, showing the true agenda, involving financial gain for certain parties. Only Big Pharma and Big Tech is benefitting financially from this, to the detriment of small business everywhere. People have been coerced and blackmailed during the pandemic, using a carrot and stick approach. Vaccination mandates have violated people’s rights. Dr. Robert Malone has warned us about the vaccines and the dangers of mRNA technology; adenovirus-based vaccines also carry grave risks. All are being imposed on healthy people who face no risks from the virus. The following concepts have had their definitions changed so as to suit the pandemic narrative: ‘pandemic’, ‘herd immunity’, ‘vaccine’, and ‘natural immunity’. These definitions were all altered to fit the defendants’ premeditated, intentional criminal offence – crimes against humanity. These definitions have not followed established epidemiological practice. He considers the concept of ‘astroturfing’ to help answer how so many people fell for this false narrative. This is a PLANdemic, not a pandemic.


At the end, Viviane Fischer invites lawyers to get in contact with the team if they would like to have evidence heard that contributes to the indictments. She also invites ordinary citizens to get in contact if they have, for example, lost their business, suffered vaccine damage, etc., so that their details may be made known to a wider audience.


contact@grand-jury.net


Reiner Fuellmich:

“we are appreciative of viewers’ participation in this model proceeding. Some lawyers did not appear today but will do so later on when witnesses are questioned. We implore you to support us, watch these proceedings and tell the world what is actually going on. There are few sources we can trust, and this is one of the most important ones.

We aim to give you a complete picture of what has happened and what is happening. Only then will we realize that we cannot trust those we are used to trusting, such as our governments and institutions, who have been infiltrated and used to propagate this agenda.

It is only us, the people, who can put an end to this. We can assure you there will be cleanup after this, including the necessary procedures to bring justice, and bring those to justice who have committed these crimes against humanity. Thank you very much.

379 views0 comments