This USA based website [https://pandemic.solari.com] offers a lot of useful advice how to challenge schools / Colleges and offers forms for employees and students whose employers, universities, colleges or schools are requiring covid injections:
Required Jab Talking Points (at schools)
This is an unapproved emergency use authorisation, experimental injection, that I will not subject my child to under any circumstance. The FDA won’t even approve it, and you want my child to be a guinea pig?!
These are not vaccines. They are experimental gene therapies. Moderna and Pfizer SEC filings both state exactly the same thing, “Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA….In addition, because no product in which mRNA is the primary active ingredient has been approved, the regulatory pathway for approval is uncertain.” (I recommend printing these documents out and highlighting those sections to present to the school staff).
As of June 25, 2021, the CDC VEARS data showed a total of 411,931 adverse event report from all age groups following Covid injections, including 6,985 deaths and 34,065 serious injuries. The VAERS system can run up to 3 months behind with its reporting, so these numbers will dramatically increase. Why would I risk my child becoming a statistic over an experimental injection, when there are treatments available for Covid, and the survival rate for children is over 99.99%?
Furthermore, the CDC recently held an emergency meeting over 1226 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in children and young adults, which they’ve said is likely from the Covid injections. Due to this, the FDA is now putting a warning on both Moderna and Pfizer fact sheets. This is just one potential side effect my child could get from this experimental injection.
Most important, is the fact that this emergency use gene therapy requires informed consent. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, Title 21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III) reiterates that individuals be informed of “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.”
The Nuremberg Code
Declaration 1 States: The voluntary consent of the human subject is a must. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. Declaration 2 States
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. Declaration 3 States
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
Declaration 4 states The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. Declaration 5 States
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. Declaration 6 States
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. Declaration 7 States
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. Declaration 8 States
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. Declaration 9 States
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible. Declaration 10 States
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
More information available HERE from the Solari Report by Catherine Austin Fitts