Updated: Mar 10
By Vasko Kohlmayer - January 20, 2022
On this web page* (and at the end of this article) you can find links to more than one thousand scientific studies and articles discussing adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines.
All of the studies have been authored by scientists and medical professionals. All of them have appeared in scientific and medical journals and publications. Most of them have been peer-reviewed. All of them present serious work by serious researchers.
Some of the post vaccine adverse reactions that these studies describe include:
Fatal cerebral haemorrhage
Immune thrombocytopenic purpura
Acute venous thromboembolism
Acute thrombosis of the coronary tree
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
Portal vein thrombosis
This is only a partial list of vaccinal afflictions.
Here are some of the titles of the studies:
Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia with disseminated intravascular coagulation and death after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination
Management of cerebral and splanchnic vein thrombosis associated with thrombocytopenia in subjects previously vaccinated with Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca)
Covid-19 vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia: a commentary on an important and practical clinical dilemma
The roles of platelets in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic immune thrombocytopenia
Roots of autoimmunity of thrombotic events after COVID-19 vaccination
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after vaccination
Thrombotic immune thrombocytopenia induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccine
Post-mortem findings in vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia
Acute symptomatic myocarditis in seven adolescents after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination
Aphasia seven days after the second dose of an mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine
Comparison of vaccine-induced thrombotic episodes between ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV.2.S vaccines
Blood clots and bleeding episodes after BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination
Myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA: practical considerations for care providers
In light of this, how can anyone claim with a straight face that the Covid-19 vaccines are completely safe? Anyone who tells you these vaccines are “completely safe” is lying through his/her teeth.
Whatever they may be, these vaccines are most definitely not safe. We can very clearly see this from the explosion of reports of death to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which coincided with the introduction of the Covid injections in late 2020.
It has been conservatively estimated that at least one hundred and fifty thousand Americans have died as a result of the COVID shots. The true number is probably closer to three hundred thousand.
It is utterly mind-boggling that they keep injecting these substances into healthy children. It is well known that healthy children are at virtually zero risk of severe Covid and as such they are in no need of Covid vaccine, especially since the vaccines cannot prevent infection or transmission.
Why would anyone inject healthy children who are in no need of inoculation against this disease with such unsafe pharmaceuticals? It is truly tragic that many children have already killed by this unhinged idea. You can watch some of their parents speak here.
There is clearly something deeply wrong and immoral with this whole vaccination enterprise.
We urge you to peruse the list of the scientific studies discussing the deadly side effects of Covid shots so that you get an idea of the highly dangerous nature of these so-called vaccines.
* While I do not necessarily agree with or endorse the editorial assertions in the introductory remarks, the way in which the authors collected and listed the studies is both useful and appreciated.
COVID-19 Vaccines: Scientific Proof of Lethality
Post published: 5 January 2022 at
Over One Thousand Scientific Studies Prove That the COVID-19 Vaccines Are Dangerous, and All Those Pushing This Agenda Are Committing the Indictable Crime of Gross Misconduct in Public Office
Just over 12 months from deployment of the COVID 19 emergency use experimental vaccines, scientific studies in the thousands, and reports of criminal complaints of assault and murder from the illegal, unlawful use of biochemical poisons made to police forces around the country, verify an assault on an unsuspecting UK population. Irrefutable science shows that the COVID 19 vaccine is not safe and not effective in limiting transmission or infection from the SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus pathogens.
The “safe and effective” false propaganda, put out by public officials who now are continuing to push this vaccine, is a clear breach of duty. A public office holder is subject to, and aware of, a duty to prevent death or serious injury that arises only by virtue of the functions of the public office.
Many have breached that duty and, in doing so, are recklessly causing a risk of death or serious injury, by carrying on regardless of the now-confirmed dangers associated with COVID 19 injections. Some of these risks are blood clotting, myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, Bell’s palsy, Guillain-Barre, cancer including deaths, etc.
All of these are confirmed in the following science-and-government-gathered data from the UK Health and Security agency on COVID 19 regarding vaccine damage.
The term “vaccine” was changed recently to incorporate this illegal, unlawful medical experiment to facilitate usage of mRNA technology that is demonstrably not a vaccine, and which contains biologically toxic nano-metamaterials associated with 5G urban data gathering capability.
Metal nanoparticulates are known in science to be genotoxic—a poison that can also cause sterilization. The dangers posed to the victims in the near term from this medical battery are now known. However, the long term lethality of this weapon is not as yet realized due to the debilitating effects it has on the immune system, causing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome(AIDS).
We can now confirm the 2017 depopulation defence-intelligence documents, showing the planned murder of over 55 million across the United Kingdom by 2025 using this biochemical weapon.
The Medicines and Healthcare (products) Regulatory Agency (MHRA) had prior warning of the expected large numbers of adverse reactions before the deployment—confirming the premeditated nature of the crime and public conduct offences then and now.
Click the link to see 1100 pieces of scientific evidence