Chris Anderson - Freedom Alliance - Election Candidate - Southend West - 3rd Feb by-election

Chris’s campaign leaflet for the Southend West by election on Thursday 3rd February. If you can help us campaign please email info@freedomalliance.co.uk. To support the campaign please use the donate button on the home page.

at https://freedomalliance.co.uk

To support the campaign please use the donate button on the home page.

https://freedomalliance.co.uk /Donate


Who Are The Freedom Alliance Party?


We are a campaigning political party founded to give a political voice to those who oppose the draconian restrictions on liberty known as "lockdown". We believe in medical freedom, personal choice, and inalienable human rights - and that governments should never use a national crisis as an excuse to limit or take these away. It is up to individuals to choose for themselves what measures they take to protect their health, during a pandemic or at any other time.


We exist because of the state imposed tyranny. We are not politicians and we were set up as a party in response to the events of 2020/21.


Our key principles as a party are


1. We are a political party born out of the freedom movement as a direct response to government overreach into every aspect of our lives.


2. We are the political arm/ wing of the Freedom Community.


3. We are made up of people from all political backgrounds, moving the dialogue away from the left Vs right debate towards a right Vs wrong - what is right for the people not what is right for the elites and big corporations. We need politicians to start making decisions in the interests of the people. Our membership model supports us to be responsive to our members and speak up about what really matters to them.


4. By standing up and questioning the narrative of the government and main political parties who have been captured and controlled, we provide an opportunity for open debate. There is currently no opposition to the government and we need this in order to restore a liberal democracy.


5. It is time for the people to be powerful in politics. We need to demystify politics and make it accessible to everyone, show people how important it is we take back control of our country.


6. We are radically different to any other political party. We are run entirely by volunteers, people passionate enough about making a difference to consider doing something unpopular (getting involved in the corrupt and dirty world of politics).


7. We are more than just a party that opposes the governments infringements on our civil liberties. In bringing like minded people together we have started to create a positive vision of how we would like our country to be governed. We need you to join us, to help develop this vision further and take back our country.


8. We are sovereign beings. We care about humanity. We want a future for our children and grandchildren which is full of joy, hope and peace, one in which they can live freely and choose the life they want to live.


What We Stand For - Our Manifesto


We have founded Freedom Alliance to give robust and credible visibility within the political system to those who oppose lockdown, because this is something no other party is doing, and because, in a democracy, it is critical that our voices are represented and heard. Millions of people in this country oppose lockdown and they are not being given a political voice. Freedom Alliance exists to provide that voice.


None of the legacy parties oppose the restrictions or give any meaningful platform to those that do. An entire political party, founded solely and exclusively to oppose lockdown restrictions, and the attendant challenges of forced masking, testing, and vaccination, cannot be so easily disregarded. That is why it is crucial we come together and make our political voice for freedom heard.


We believe in protecting and preserving the absolute rights of people to:

  • Leave home whenever they choose

  • Make a living and operate business premises

  • Freely associate, assemble and peacefully protest

  • Speak freely without censorship or penalty

  • Make their own medical choices without coercion or penalties.


Medical Freedom


Freedom Alliance is committed to preserving and upholding the principles of bodily integrity, medical freedom, and informed consent.


In line with the ethical principles outlined by the Nuremberg Code (1), and UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2), Freedom Alliance will campaign for your rights to choose what path of medical treatment is right for you and your family. We will work to ensure there are no penalties or disadvantages attached should you choose to decline a medical product or treatment, including medical testing, for any reason.


Whilst we champion scientific breakthroughs that save lives, and support the right of any person wishing to receive a vaccination to do so, we will always vigorously oppose any level of vaccination mandate, whether explicit – making a vaccine outright compulsory – or tacit – making full participation in society conditional on vaccination status. We will also apply the same principles to medical testing. It is an individual’s right to accept or decline any medical test as they see fit, and we will work to ensure there are no penalties or freedom-curtailing measures applied to individuals as a result of personal medical decisions. Freedom Alliance is a pro-choice party and does not believe any individual should be discriminated against for their personal medical choice.

Freedom Alliance will also work to ensure medical professionals rigorously adhere to their own ruling body’s guidelines of informed consent when offering any medical product or treatment, including vaccination. Doctors in the UK are bound by the terms of the Montgomery ruling, which states:


“The doctor is therefore under a duty to take reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in any recommended treatment, and of any reasonable alternative or variant treatments. The test of materiality is whether, in the circumstances of the particular case, a reasonable person in the patient’s position would be likely to attach significance to the risk, or the doctor is or should reasonably be aware that the particular patient would be likely to attach significance to it.” – Judgment in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11, paragraph 87.


The ruling also notes that frequency of risk is not the only factor that should be taken into consideration when informing patients (3). Therefore, Freedom Alliance believes it is incumbent on doctors to make patients aware of all material risks of vaccination before they consent to receive them, including risks that may be considered more uncommon. This is especially important in the context of the coronavirus crisis, where an array of fast-tracked, experimental, and unlicensed vaccines will shortly (when writing in November 2020) be available to the population, and the extent of potential risks and adverse events, both short and long-term, is not known.


Freedom Alliance also believes that parents or legal guardians are the appropriate parties to make medical decisions for children, and will challenge the current application of the Gillick competency ruling (4), which permits children to make medical decisions without parental knowledge or consent. While the UK legal system correctly recognises that children under 16 are not mature or responsible enough to offer their own consent for an array of actions, this principle is frequently flouted where it comes to vaccination, an area in which Gillick competency is often invoked to justify administering vaccinations to children – including under duress – without parental consent.


Children are not competent decision-makers where it comes to serious and potentially life-altering processes, which is precisely why we have age-based consent laws to protect them. Freedom Alliance will seek to overhaul the current institution of the Gillick competency ruling to ensure it reflects that reality. Whilst Freedom Alliance recognises vulnerable children in exceptional circumstances may sometimes require legal protection to make their own medical decisions, in the large majority of cases, where parents or guardians are recognised as competent caregivers, Freedom Alliance believes medical practitioners must require the express, informed consent of parents or guardians to apply any medical procedures to children.


To sum, Freedom Alliance believes in requiring the transparency and accountability of the medical profession in gaining the full and informed consent of all patients prior to administering any treatments. We believe in medical care coming from consent, not coercion or deception (including deception by omission), and that no individual should feel pressured into accepting a medical treatment they have reservations about. Further, we are committed to ensuring that no child is expected or pressurised to make adult decisions they are not ready for. Freedom Alliance will protect the autonomy and freedom of you and your family to make the healthcare choices that are right for you – with no social or economic penalties resulting from what you decide. We genuinely believe that it is your body and your choice.

References:

1) https://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1448.1

2) http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

3) https://www.themdu.com/guidance-and-advice/guides/montgomery-and-informed-consent

4) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962726/



Freedom Alliance party statement on the so-called ‘vaccines’ against COVID-19


Our party’s position on the so-called covid ‘vaccines’ is summarised below.

  1. Covid ‘vaccines’ are not vaccines in the accepted sense. They do not prevent infection or transmission. They do not contain attenuated or inactivated virus particles, but instead utilise experimental gene technology. They would be more accurately described as gene therapy treatments. As such, they should not have been included in the Government Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, and manufacturers should accept full liability for any related injuries or deaths. As things stand, pharmaceutical companies have complete immunity from prosecution and compensation claims, while recipients of the ‘vaccines’ are not provided with immunity to COVID-19.

  2. Suppression of information about the covid ‘vaccines’ makes informed consent impossible. Prior to vaccination, recipients are not informed that Phase Three trials have not yet been completed, and that they are therefore taking part in a clinical trial. This is a breach of the Nuremberg Code, which states that “voluntary consent of the human subject is essential”.Furthermore, ‘vaccine’ recipients are not made aware of the deeply disturbing data from the Yellow Card reporting system, which, at the time of writing, has recorded almost 1.5 million adverse events, and nearly 2,000 fatalities in the UK. The lack of transparency regarding side effects is compounded by the ubiquitous but unsubstantiated messaging in the mainstream media that the ‘vaccines’ are “safe and effective”, as well as strategies employed by government agency SPI-B (the Independent Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours) deliberately to inflate levels of fear and anxiety about the virus among the public. The distorted representation of the risks and benefits of the ‘vaccines’ means that informed consent is not achievable in the current political climate.

  3. Coercive measures such as vaccine passports and vaccine mandates are an erosion not only of informed consent, but the inalienable human right to bodily autonomy. People should not be forced to choose between the jab and their jobs, or be prevented from participating in society if they exercise their right to decline a medical treatment. Coercion is a contravention of Article Six of UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, which states:“Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.”

Some political parties and commentators are calling for an end to vaccine passports and mandates based on the right of the individual to choose. However, we believe this does not go far enough. It is our view that, in the absence of informed consent, there can be no genuine freedom of choice. While accurate information about the relative risks of the virus and the ‘vaccines’ remains unavailable to the general public, it is impossible for people to give informed consent. It is therefore the position of the Freedom Alliance party that there must be an immediate halt to the vaccine rollout, to allow a comprehensive, independent investigation into the safety of the ‘vaccines’ to be carried out.


In the words of scientist and researcher Dr Tess Lawrie, former consultant to the World Health Organisation:

“An immediate halt to the vaccination programme is required whilst a full and independent safety analysis is undertaken to investigate the full extent of the harms …


The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans.

2022 Manifesto in Full

https://freedomalliance.co.uk/manifesto/2404-2/



REGISTER YOUR SUPPORT NOW


By registering a significant number of votes, we will send a powerful and incontrovertible message to those who seek to keep the UK in a permanent state of illiberal restrictions - that we the people do not accept these outrageous and undemocratic restrictions on our liberty, and we will fight back.


15 views0 comments