by GREGORY SAMS
Big Pharma and the medical establishment are the new all-powerful priesthood
WE see unprecedented use of ‘unprecedented’ today.
Yes, it applies to putting entire nations under house arrest.
Yes, it applies to the near- universal wearing of masks (more accurately muzzles).
Yes, it applies to needing a passport to be normal. But perhaps the entire phenomenon we are experiencing is not unprecedented.
Let us look back in time to AD 380, when Rome became the superspreader of Christianity by making it their empire’s official religion. Within 100 years the Roman Empire collapsed but despite the death of its host, Christianity survived and for more than 1,000 years, the head of the Catholic Church was the most powerful figure in Europe.
Most rulers of nations, then and now, have one core raison d’être, which is to protect us from other versions of themselves. But the Catholic Church would tolerate no other versions. Its Pope reigned supreme, having spiritual authority over kings, dukes, princes and local overlords.
As the Lord’s Prayer tells us “... thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven”. Your local priesthood conveyed the will to be done on earth, working hand in glove with the local lord, whose temporal power was recognised by God’s official mouthpiece: the Pope.
You may ask how the Church came to have and maintain such power. The answer is simple: faith and fear. They had agents throughout the land, with a church in every town. The priest class, from archbishops down to parish priests, were the most highly-educated and respected sector of society. The priesthood was a sought-after secure profession, and people had faith in the truth of what the priest told them. It was often sound advice they could find nowhere else.
The Church had a near monopoly on education, with part of the core curriculum being God and creation, Jesus and miracles, sin and salvation, as well as good deeds, forgiveness, and useful guidance. Most priests were good people, people of faith, and following their advice was the passport to Heaven.
Then there was the fear. The Devil can manifest anywhere in the world, tempting people to stray from the path of righteousness. The Devil can be lurking unseen within any one of us, prompting urges that God wants us to suppress. We must be on our guard from those he may have corrupted. We must follow the priest’s advice to avoid the fearsome prospect of Hell.
Believers knew that if they behaved badly during their 50 or so years of this existence, they would suffer a miserable and horrific afterlife in Hell, for eternity. What a terrifying prospect! This was the picture the Church taught and most people absolutely believed what they were told by the priests. Bastards, born out of wedlock, were a product of sin and not welcome in society. Those who missed church on Sunday were avoided. Just speaking with these dangerous people could infect one with sinful thoughts.
Not all the ‘common’ people bought into the Church’s teachings or went to priests for advice on things spiritual or material. Some chose a more direct spiritual interface with the living world. Many were women who also practised unlicensed healing, whether through herbs or ‘occult’ practices invoking natural energies of the earth and human body.
Tens of thousands of these women were burned, drowned or tortured to death as witches, for their deviant beliefs.
Of course, being a God-fearing churchgoer did not stop people from being sinners, but at least you were trying and could confess your sins to the priest, do some penance, pay and be forgiven. Without that escape clause, the ungodly sinner was doomed to Hell.
Those who wrote or spoke publicly in contradiction of the church’s teachings were guilty of heresy and their books burned and banned, as well as the heretic themselves at times.
To speak disrespectfully of things holy was considered blasphemy, punishable as a serious crime, occasionally warranting death. This unfortunate situation still prevails in many Islamic nations, with a religion 600 years younger than Christianity.
The Catholic Church does not have the power it once held over the minds of those in Western cultures. The credibility of the Church has not been helped in recent years by the paedophile scandals surrounding its priesthood.
Today we are witnessing a new ‘religion’ taking hold and while this one has nothing to do with spirituality, it has spread faster than any before. It has gripped the minds of billions across the world and is also powered by faith and fear, with an enemy as invisible as Hell and the Devil himself. Curiously, it has had its greatest success to date in the West, perhaps filling the fear vacuum that has been created by the recession of the Church in daily life.
Today’s priesthood is embodied in the medical industry, staffed by highly-trained professionals with secure careers, for whom the public has high regard. Just as we once needed priests to act as intermediaries to God, we now need trained doctors as intermediaries to our bodies and guardians of our health.
Many people are sadly out of touch with their mortal frame and have unquestioning faith in doctors knowing best – the high priests of health.
The medical establishment does not like competition for its services, doing whatever it can to ban or denigrate healing practices other than its own, whether herbs or naturopathy, prayer or acupuncture, homeopathy or reiki. Theirs is the only true path to health, and all other routes are portrayed as fraught with danger.
We do not know how well organised Christians were before the Romans assimilated them – before Christian belief was standardised and regulated at the Council of Nicaea.
We do know that before the healing profession was dominated by the World Health Organisation, The Centre for Disease Control, and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation, there was full medical freedom of choice for the individual.
In 1880 there were more homeopaths in the USA than allopathic doctors, while mechanics earned more than either of them. It is no accident that the WHO, CDC, and GAVI are largely funded by the pharmaceutical industry, and headed by their chosen men and women. They have become today’s equivalent of the Vatican during its 1,000 years of dominance. They claim a monopoly on truth and woe betide those who question or counter it.
Notable physicians, respected virologists, vaccine designers, even a Nobel Prize winner have countered the official narrative and lost their positions, been discredited, denounced and excommunicated; they are denied any further involvement in the hospitals, clinics and practices that are spread across the land as thickly as were early chapels, churches and cathedrals.
Popular speakers, performers and entertainers have had their bookings cancelled for refusing to be vaccinated, or for questioning the vaccine passports. We could view these outspoken characters as being ‘excovidicated’ from the medical and media establishments.
It takes a lot of faith to accept being injected with a partially-tested, new-concept mRNA injection. Taking the second jab could be seen as one’s baptism into the Covidian Church. Like it or not, it is an affirmation and commitment, and unlike the splashing of holy water and utterance of sacred words, it may be difficult to decouple our immune system from the one implanted by Big Pharma.
This new system will need an upgrade every six months to keep your internal software up to date. Where have we heard this before? What will system crashes look like?
Just as going to church does not prevent God-fearing folk from sinning, taking the injection does not prevent covid-fearing folk from getting the disease or from spreading it.
But, we are told, if the case is bad enough to need hospitalisation, the sufferer will be less likely to die. Considering that the covid survival rate, before vaccination began, was over 99.9%, how much the vaccine increases it is, perhaps, a moot point.
In today’s somewhat free society, it is okay to declare that the Queen is a shape-shifting lizard, okay to accuse the Bush family and their associates of taking down the three towers (the twins and WTC 7); okay to accuse Hillary Clinton of running a paedophile ring and drinking an extract of tortured children.
It is decidedly not okay to counter the narrative of ‘Big Pharma’ – to suggest that covid-19 is not an existential threat; to recommend tested known treatments for it; to disclose that natural immunity is widespread and better than jabs; or to publicise the hundreds of thousands of documented serious adverse reactions to the injection. Those who question or counter the narrative on any level are guilty of (forgive me) ‘blaspharmy.’
Thou shalt not speak against the trinity of the CDC, WHO and GAVI.
Instead of burning books today, they ‘burn’ the online platforms of those who question or challenge the narrative of Big Pharma. YouTube channels are shut down without warning, with all their content removed from view – troves of information that was approved and online for years. Twitter accounts are terminated.
Much like the bad old Soviets used to remove people from official photos when they fell out of favour, today Wikipedia entries of repeat blaspharmers can be erased, with Google searches relegating links to 20th pages.
This all may be more ‘climate- friendly’ than burning books, but it does immense harm to the free flow of ideas, the emergence of truth, and the connected feedback loops that power positive evolution.
The parallel has been made with the papal precedent. There is much of positive value to gain from Church teachings but they are not and never were the only source of spiritual and moral guidance. Neither is the medical establishment the only viable source of sound and effective advice on healing and health.
Its biggest player, Big Pharma, does exceedingly well out of poor health.